The Trump Administration is now asking a federal appeals court to approve a scaled-back plan to cut the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s workforce by more than half, signaling a strategic pivot after months of legal setbacks. Under the revised proposal, CFPB staffing would fall to 556 employees from roughly 1,174 today, replacing an earlier plan that sought to eliminate up to 90% of the agency. The move, filed in a motion with the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, is designed to convince judges that the Bureau can be dramatically downsized without being effectively dismantled, a distinction that could determine the CFPB’s fate.
What’s changed
- From elimination to “right-sizing”: The administration is explicitly arguing it will not shut down the CFPB, but instead align staffing with statutory duties and budget constraints.
- New staffing target: 556 employees across the agency, with detailed allocations by function.
- Funding pressure: The One Big Beautiful Bill Act cut the CFPB’s funding cap roughly in half, which the administration says makes a smaller workforce unavoidable.
The internal restructuring plan paints a clear picture of how the Bureau would look:
- Supervision: Reduced to 77 employees (down from more than 500 previously)
- Enforcement: Cut to 50 employees (down from about 250)
- Consumer response & complaints: 90 employees retained, with increased reliance on automation and contractors
- Rulemaking (regulations): One of the least impacted areas, retaining 125 employees
The emphasis is clear: maintain core statutory functions, such as complaint handling and rulemaking, while significantly scaling back supervision and enforcement.
In its latest filing, the CFPB is seeking three things:
- Modify the current injunction to allow layoffs to proceed immediately
- Send the case back to the district court for reconsideration
- Pause the broader appeal while the lower court reevaluates the new plan
The argument: this updated plan eliminates the need for broad judicial intervention because it preserves the agency, albeit at a much smaller scale.
.




